What are the best practices for conducting effective CCB meetings and reviews? (2024)

Before you start any CCB meeting or review, make sure that everyone involved knows their roles and responsibilities. The CCB typically consists of a chairperson, a secretary, and representatives from various functional areas, such as engineering, testing, quality, customer, and management. The chairperson leads the meeting, sets the agenda, and facilitates the discussion. The secretary records the minutes, tracks the action items, and updates the CM database. The representatives review the change requests, provide feedback, and vote on the approval or rejection of the changes. Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of each CCB member helps to avoid confusion, duplication, and delays.

Another key to successful CCB meetings and reviews is to prepare the change requests and supporting documents in advance. A change request is a formal document that describes the proposed change, its rationale, its impact, its priority, and its dependencies. Supporting documents may include technical specifications, design drawings, test results, risk assessments, cost estimates, and customer feedback. Preparing these documents ahead of time ensures that the CCB has all the information it needs to evaluate the change request and make an informed decision.

A structured and consistent process for CCB meetings and reviews can help streamline the workflow and reduce the risk of errors and inconsistencies. This process may involve submitting the change request and supporting documents to the CM team for review and validation, scheduling the CCB meeting, distributing the agenda and documents to members, conducting the meeting and presenting the change request, discussing any questions or issues raised by members, voting on approval or rejection of the change request, communicating the decision to relevant stakeholders, implementing the approved change request, verifying and auditing it, and updating the CM baseline and records. By following such a process, changes can be managed in a timely, transparent, and traceable manner.

Using appropriate tools and techniques can significantly increase the effectiveness and efficiency of CCB meetings and reviews. CM software, for example, automates and simplifies the CM tasks, such as creating, storing, tracking, and reporting change requests and CIs. It also enables collaboration between CCB members and other stakeholders, as well as providing audit trails and security features. Online platforms are another beneficial tool which allow CCB members to conduct meetings and reviews remotely with video conferencing, screen sharing, chat, and file sharing features. Additionally, decision-making techniques can help analyze, compare, and choose among different options for change requests. These techniques include criteria-based evaluation, multi-voting, and consensus - each requiring active participation from CCB members. In conclusion, using the right tools and techniques can significantly improve the quality, speed, and accuracy of CCB decisions.

One of the most difficult aspects of CCB meetings and reviews is effectively managing conflicts and expectations among the CCB members and other stakeholders. Conflicts can arise due to varying perspectives, interests, preferences, or priorities for change requests, and expectations can differ based on the scope, complexity, urgency, or feasibility of the change requests. To manage these conflicts and expectations adequately, it is important to establish clear ground rules and guidelines for the CCB meetings and reviews, such as roles, responsibilities, procedures, criteria, and deadlines. Additionally, encouraging respectful and constructive dialogue between the CCB members and other stakeholders is essential; personal attacks, blame, or criticism should be avoided. Acknowledging and addressing any concerns or issues raised by the CCB members and other stakeholders should also be done while providing evidence, rationale, and alternatives where possible. Ultimately, seeking win-win solutions that balance the needs and interests of all parties involved while maintaining the project objectives is key. Lastly, communicating the CCB decisions clearly and promptly to all relevant stakeholders with explanations of reasons and implications will help foster trust, cooperation, and satisfaction among all involved.

The last best practice for conducting effective CCB meetings and reviews is to evaluate and improve the CCB performance. This includes measuring and monitoring how well the CCB meets its goals, objectives, and expectations, as well as identifying and implementing actions to enhance the CCB processes, practices, and outcomes. To accomplish this, you should define and collect key performance indicators (KPIs) for the CCB activities, analyze and report the results of the KPIs, solicit feedback from stakeholders on their experiences, perceptions, and suggestions for improvement of the CCB activities, plan and execute improvement actions based on the results of the KPIs and feedback, and review and assess the effectiveness of the improvement actions. Evaluating and improving the CCB performance can help you ensure that it meets its purpose and adds value to the CM process.

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Configuration Management

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.